🐈 The Cat — Human’s Best Friend

A Scholarly Reflection on the Nature of Companionship

By Ronen Kolton Yehuda (MKR: Messiah King RKY)

Abstract

For generations, the phrase “the dog is man’s best friend” has shaped popular and scientific thought about interspecies bonds. Yet new behavioral evidence, emotional observation, and historical reflection reveal a more nuanced reality. The domestic cat (Felis catus)—an animal of intelligence, independence, and quiet empathy—embodies a companionship distinct from that of the dog: calmer, freer, and often deeper. This article explores the evolutionary, psychological, and philosophical reasons the cat deserves recognition as human’s best friend, uniting scientific research with social insight, ethics, and cultural symbolism.

1 Introduction — Rethinking a Cultural Proverb

Dogs have long symbolized loyalty and service, while cats have been dismissed as aloof or mysterious. The contrast arises from behavior, not emotion. Dogs express attachment through obedience and exuberance; cats express it through presence, calm, and subtle interaction.

Yet friendship is not obedience. True companionship rests on mutual respect, voluntary attachment, and shared understanding. The cat’s manner of love—freely given, never commanded—embodies a friendship between equals. To question the proverb is not to deny the dog’s worth but to expand our idea of what real friendship means.

2 Evolutionary Background and Domestication

Dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) emerged from wolves through selective breeding for herding, guarding, and cooperation. Their loyalty is rooted in a pack hierarchy transferred to human relationships.

Cats followed another path. Archaeological evidence from the Fertile Crescent shows wildcats drawn to early granaries by rodents. Humans accepted them for pest control but did not breed them. In essence, cats domesticated themselves.

This self-domestication forged a partner species that kept its autonomy. The cat’s bond with humans is not conditioned by dominance but by chosen coexistence—a friendship entered freely.

3 Historical and Cultural Presence of the Cat

Across time, cats have occupied sacred and symbolic roles.

In ancient Egypt they embodied the goddess Bastet, guardian of home and fertility. In Asia they signified luck and longevity. In Europe they moved from superstition’s shadow to the artist’s muse.

From Leonardo da Vinci to Colette and Mark Twain, writers praised the cat’s balance of intellect and grace. As humanity moved from farms to cities, the cat adapted—its stillness suiting an era of study and reflection. It evolved beside civilization: from temple protector to contemplative companion.

4 Scientific Evidence of Feline Attachment

Modern research confirms what cat lovers have always sensed.

A 2019 Oregon State University study using the “secure-base” test found 64 % of cats show secure attachment to owners—comparable to human infants (Vitale et al., 2019). Securely attached cats explored confidently when their guardian was near.

A Dutch study (Bouma et al., 2022) reported that people describe their cats as family members or best friends, and that this perception correlates with psychological well-being.

Further experiments (Shreve & Udell, 2017) revealed many cats prefer human interaction to food or toys.

Science thus recognizes the cat as an animal of deep social intelligence—attached by choice, not command.

Authored by: Ronen Kolton Yehuda (MKR: Messiah King RKY)
Check out my blogs:
Substack: ronenkoltonyehuda.substack.com
Blogger: ronenkoltonyehuda.blogspot.com
Medium: medium.com/@ronenkoltonyehuda

5 The Psychology of Independence and Equality

Friendship thrives where freedom exists.

A dog’s devotion follows hierarchy: the human as leader.

A cat’s devotion follows equality: the human as companion.

When a cat rubs against a leg or settles nearby, that gesture is affection by will, not conditioning. The relationship mirrors mature friendship—mutual trust sustained without control.

The cat demonstrates that loyalty need not be loud; it is freedom that returns home of its own accord.

6 The Cat in the Modern Human Environment

Modern life—crowded cities, long hours, and digital fatigue—favors tranquil companionship.

The cat fits this world effortlessly: it lives indoors, maintains cleanliness, and offers quiet presence. While dogs thrive on constant interaction, cats thrive on calm continuity, turning solitude into comfort.

Their sensitivity to human mood creates emotional synchrony; they respond to tone and gesture more than to orders. In overstimulated homes, the cat’s serenity becomes a form of balance.

6.1 Domestic Grace — Cleanliness, Privacy, and Practical Companionship

Another dimension of the cat’s suitability as a human companion lies in its natural self-maintenance and hygiene.

Unlike dogs, which require frequent outdoor walks for exercise and elimination, the domestic cat manages its bodily functions and grooming entirely within the home.

Cats instinctively use litter boxes, a behavior derived from their desert ancestors (Felis silvestris lybica), who buried waste to conceal their scent and presence from predators and rivals (Turner & Bateson, 2014). This self-sufficient habit harmonizes perfectly with modern human life:

no need for daily outdoor routines, no exposure to traffic or weather, and no dependency on human schedule or availability.

Equally remarkable is the cat’s commitment to personal cleanliness. Through frequent grooming—often totaling 30–50% of its waking hours (Hart & Hart, 2013)—the cat maintains fur condition, thermoregulation, and emotional balance. A cat’s saliva contains natural cleaning enzymes, and its tongue’s keratinized papillae act as a microcomb, removing loose hair and debris (Noonan et al., 2018).

Grooming also plays a psychological role: studies show that self-grooming reduces feline stress, acting as a self-soothing mechanism akin to meditation or rhythmic behavior in humans (Stella & Croney, 2016).

From a human perspective, this means the cat’s companionship is low-maintenance yet deeply intimate. It cohabits gracefully, sharing space without invading it, maintaining the serenity of the domestic environment.

Whereas the dog requires supervision, schedules, and outdoor management, the cat offers trust, autonomy, and continuity—a partner that thrives in stillness rather than dependence.

In the quiet elegance of its domestic habits, the cat becomes not only a companion of comfort but a model of coexistence—teaching that harmony begins with balance between self-care and shared care.

6.2 Natural Defender — The Cat as Silent Guardian of the Home

While the dog protects the household through noise and deterrence, the cat safeguards it through vigilance and precision.

When unfamiliar people enter, dogs often respond with loud alarm or physical confrontation — behaviors that, while protective, can escalate unnecessarily or endanger familiar visitors. Studies of canine aggression toward both strangers and family members highlight the unpredictability of defensive overreaction, especially in territorial breeds or insufficiently socialized dogs (Patronek, Slater & Marder, 2010; Cornelissen & Hopster, 2010).

It is worth noting that small-sized dogs — those comparable in body mass to the average cat — rarely possess the strength to provide genuine physical defense. Their deterrent power lies almost entirely in vocalization. Their barking may alert humans to an intrusion, but it cannot prevent or repel it. Thus, while the large dog defends through strength and intimidation, the small dog defends only through sound.

The cat, by contrast, guards through observation and discretion. It notices intrusion yet rarely endangers humans. Its instinctive caution allows it to adapt quickly to household boundaries, responding not with force but with spatial awareness and withdrawal. This defensive restraint makes the feline presence compatible with modern domestic life, where social visitors are frequent and aggression is undesirable.

However, against smaller invaders — rats, mice, snakes, cockroaches, and other pests — the cat’s role becomes active and indispensable.

Research confirms that the domestic cat’s hunting drive, inherited from Felis silvestris lybica, remains intact despite domestication (Turner & Bateson, 2014). Observational studies demonstrate that even well-fed house cats exhibit predatory behavior, capturing or killing rodents and insects within their environment (Fitzgerald & Turner, 2000; Loss et al., 2013).

This natural pest control reduces dependence on chemical traps and poisons, contributing to a safer and more ecological household.

Thus, the cat’s guardianship complements the dog’s: where the dog defends through intimidation, the cat protects through equilibrium.

It maintains order silently, preventing intrusion not by force but by presence — a guardian of balance, cleanliness, and calm.

7 Health and Therapeutic Benefits

Research links cat ownership to tangible health gains:

Lower stress and blood pressure: Cat owners show reduced cardiovascular reactivity under strain (Allen et al., 2002).
Enhanced mental health: Studies associate feline companionship with higher happiness and lower loneliness (McHarg et al., 2018).
Healing vibration: The purr’s 25–150 Hz frequency range promotes bone growth and tissue repair and induces calm (National Geographic, 2019).

The cat’s companionship is both emotional and physiological—affection as therapy, comfort as medicine.

8 Loyalty and Return Behavior

Cats’ loyalty manifests through constancy, not command.

Numerous reports describe cats traveling immense distances to return home. They recognize their owners’ voices and scents, and exhibit anxiety when separated.

This is loyalty grounded in memory and trust—the loyalty of choice, not of training.

Their devotion is quiet yet enduring: companionship that asks for nothing but presence.

9 Ethical and Philosophical Dimensions

The ethics of the cat–human bond rest on reciprocity.

Humans cannot compel affection; they must earn it through patience and respect. The cat’s independence turns the relationship into a partnership of equals, challenging the anthropocentric idea of mastery.

This coexistence—affection without domination—offers a moral lesson. The cat embodies harmony between solitude and love, proving that closeness need not threaten freedom.

It teaches an ethics of friendship: to care without control, to love without possession.

10 Symbolism — The Cat, the Dog, and the Meaning of Respect

Every culture mirrors its moral values in animals.

The dog, descended from wolves, stands for loyalty and service—but also dependence. In many languages, calling someone a dog or a wolf implies moral weakness or dishonor. The wolf suggests greed or threat; the dog, obedience and servitude.

The cat, by contrast, represents dignity and self-respect. From ancient temples to heraldic art, felines have symbolized grace, freedom, and courage. The lion—the grandest of them—embodies leadership joined with restraint, a creature admired rather than commanded.

The domestic cat inherits this lineage. It does not beg; it chooses. It befriends humans without surrendering its pride. Its affection carries the same quiet majesty as the lion’s rule: strong, composed, and self-governing.

Where the dog’s love may resemble subservience, the cat’s reflects mutual recognition.

The dog mirrors the wolf’s pack devotion; the cat mirrors the lion’s wisdom—the power to love without losing freedom.

Through this symbolism, the cat becomes not only a companion but a moral emblem: the ideal of friendship grounded in respect. It reminds humanity that the highest form of love preserves the dignity of both sides.

11 Comparison with the Dog — Two Archetypes of Love

Dogs and cats express two complementary human longings.

The dog externalizes loyalty—active, visible, vocal.

The cat internalizes loyalty—silent, stable, introspective.

The dog satisfies our need for affirmation; the cat satisfies our need for peace.

Where the dog says, “I will follow you,” the cat says, “I will stay beside you.”

One loves through obedience; the other through equality.

At the same time, dogs—especially large or poorly socialized breeds—can display aggression that threatens humans. Veterinary and forensic data record cases in which dogs have injured or even killed infants or family members, often without clear provocation. Such events, though rare, reveal a potential danger inherent in the species’ strength and pack instincts.

Cats, in contrast, rarely pose lethal risk to humans. Their defensive reactions—scratching or light biting—occur only when provoked or overstimulated, and are non-fatal. They seldom attack strangers or household members and do not form packs that magnify aggression. A cat’s nature is self-protective, not offensive.

Thus, even behaviorally, the cat embodies companionship tempered by restraint. It coexists without threat, guarding domestic peace rather than endangering it.

11.1 Comparative Aggression — The Cat and the Dog

Just as dogs and cats express love in distinct ways, they also differ profoundly in how they express aggression and resolve conflict. Both carry ancestral instincts—predatory drive, territoriality, and defense—but their evolutionary paths created opposite behavioral logics: one built on hierarchy and group dynamics, the other on solitude and sensitivity.

Dogs: Hierarchical and Group-Based Aggression

Canine aggression often arises from pack hierarchy and social competition. Because dogs evolved as cooperative hunters, challenges to dominance or perceived threats to the group can provoke sudden, coordinated violence.

When directed toward humans, these instincts sometimes manifest tragically. Veterinary and forensic studies document numerous cases where dogs—particularly large or poorly socialized breeds—have inflicted severe or fatal injuries on family members, often without sustained provocation (Patronek et al., 2010).

Dog aggression is typically offensive: an attempt to assert control, guard territory, or protect resources. Training and selective breeding can reduce but not fully remove this potential.

Cats: Solitary and Defensive Aggression

Felines, in contrast, are primarily solitary hunters. Their aggression is defensive and situational, triggered by fear, pain, overstimulation, or intrusion on personal space.

Most feline attacks occur when subtle warning signs—flattened ears, tail flicking, pupil dilation, tense posture—are ignored (Landsberg, Hunthausen & Ackerman, 2013).

Cats seldom pursue conflict once the stimulus is removed; they return swiftly to calm. Their violence is reactive rather than strategic—self-protection, not domination.

Risk to Humans and Public Safety

While cat-related injuries rarely cause death, they present distinct medical dangers. A single bite or deep scratch can introduce pathogens such as Pasteurella multocida or Bartonella henselae (“cat-scratch disease”), producing localized infection, fever, or lymph-node swelling (Talan et al., 1999; Moriello, 2017).

In rarer but well-documented cases, the bacteria can reach the eye, causing neuroretinitis or ocular inflammation that may impair or even permanently damage vision (Spach et al., 1995; Reed et al., 2014).

Such incidents underscore that feline aggression—though seldom lethal—can be serious and medically consequential.

Dog attacks, conversely, cause fewer infections but vastly greater physical trauma and fatalities worldwide (Cornelissen & Hopster, 2010). Each species thus poses a different risk profile: dogs threaten through force, cats through precision.

Aggression as Communication

In both animals, aggression serves as communication rather than malice.

Dogs warn through barks and stances; cats through silence, gaze, and micro-signals.

When humans respect these cues—allowing space, adjusting tone, and observing boundaries—trust deepens. Behavioral studies confirm that environmental enrichment, predictable routines, and gentle handling markedly reduce feline aggression (de Porter & Overall, 2018).

Understanding these instincts refines our moral perspective: genuine companionship requires awareness of nature as much as affection.

Moral Parallel

If the dog’s danger lies in excess of energy, the cat’s lies in excess of sensitivity.

The dog charges; the cat recoils. Both remind us that love must coexist with self-control and respect for difference. Recognizing aggression as part of the living spectrum of behavior allows friendship—human or animal—to remain rooted in empathy rather than idealization.

12 Implications for Human Friendship

Seeing the cat as human’s best friend reshapes not only our understanding of interspecies relationships but also our conception of friendship itself.

For centuries, humans have idealized relationships based on loyalty, dependence, and service — traits embodied by the dog. Yet the cat, through its quiet independence, offers a subtler model: friendship rooted in freedom, mutual recognition, and emotional self-governance.

12.1 Love Without Possession

The cat’s affection teaches that love does not require ownership or control.

When a cat sits near its human, it gives presence rather than obedience; it joins rather than follows. Its companionship is voluntary, not transactional.

This simple behavioral truth carries a profound human lesson: the purest bonds are those sustained without coercion.

Friendship thrives when both sides preserve their individuality, meeting not through demand but through desire.

Psychologists note that sustainable human relationships share the same pattern — secure attachment with autonomy (Bowlby, 1988; Deci & Ryan, 2000). Dependence breeds exhaustion; voluntary connection breeds respect.

12.2 Emotional Intelligence and Empathy

Cats respond to human emotion in subtle yet accurate ways. They recognize tone, posture, and atmosphere, often providing calm proximity during grief or illness.

Unlike demonstrative comfort, feline empathy is quiet — a form of emotional mirroring rather than performance.

This mirrors what modern psychology calls empathic attunement: the ability to sense and reflect emotion without absorbing or amplifying it.

Humans who learn from this pattern cultivate a calmer form of empathy — compassionate but not consuming, attentive but not invasive.

Such emotional balance is increasingly vital in a world saturated with overstimulation and constant communication. The cat models how to care without intrusion.

12.3 Respecting Boundaries

Every cat guardian learns that affection must follow the animal’s rhythm.

Too much touch, too soon, and the bond retreats; patience invites trust.

Human friendships operate on the same invisible law: closeness without boundary becomes dependency; distance without warmth becomes isolation.

Healthy friendship respects cycles of solitude and connection, presence and absence — just as cats alternate between attention and retreat.

By observing a cat’s restraint, humans learn that respecting personal boundaries is not coldness but maturity.

12.4 Philosophy of Coexistence

The cat embodies a modern ethic of coexistence — to share space without dominance, to live together in harmony yet remain free.

In human societies built on hierarchy and competition, this lesson is revolutionary.

It suggests that true companionship, whether between individuals or nations, depends on equilibrium rather than submission.

The cat’s silent partnership with humankind, spanning millennia without servitude or conquest, offers a model of peaceful coexistence born of mutual utility and quiet admiration.

Where the dog mirrors the social contract — protection in exchange for authority — the cat mirrors a moral contract: freedom in exchange for respect.

12.5 The Cat as Mirror of the Self

To befriend a cat is to encounter oneself.

The animal’s calm detachment reflects our own capacity for self-containment.

Its refusal to please at all costs confronts the human tendency to seek approval.

In learning to accept the cat’s rhythm, humans rediscover patience, humility, and non-verbal understanding.

Friendship, in this light, becomes a spiritual exercise — an art of perceiving without expecting, loving without claiming.

Through the feline example, we glimpse a gentler definition of companionship: one that honors both independence and belonging.

12.6 From the Domestic Home to the Human Heart

The implications extend beyond personal life.

In workplaces, communities, and nations, sustainable cooperation resembles feline friendship more than canine hierarchy.

Respectful distance, mutual trust, and self-discipline produce harmony where dominance fails.

The cat’s behavior demonstrates that coexistence can be peaceful not because one commands and the other obeys, but because both choose balance over control.

As philosopher Erich Fromm observed, love matures when it transcends dependency and becomes an act of freedom — exactly the form of affection the cat gives daily.

12.7 Conclusion to Section 12

To call the cat human’s best friend, therefore, is to recognize a moral ideal: friendship as a meeting of equals.

It teaches that loyalty need not be loud, that compassion can coexist with privacy, and that affection is strongest when freely offered.

The feline way of love invites humanity to grow gentler, wiser, and freer — to replace control with connection and possession with presence.

In this sense, the cat does more than share our homes; it civilizes our hearts..

13 Human Temperament — The Dog Type and the Cat Type

Human beings, like the companions they choose, reveal aspects of their own nature through their preferences.

Psychological research and cultural analysis both suggest that the distinction between “dog people” and “cat people” is more than anecdotal — it reflects two different approaches to emotion, freedom, and social structure.

The Dog Type: Social, Outward, and Loyal Through Structure

Dog-oriented personalities tend to value clear hierarchy, teamwork, and external affirmation.

They are often extroverted, socially engaged, and expressive, finding comfort in communal belonging and predictable bonds.

Like dogs, such individuals thrive on visible connection and reassurance. Their friendships are demonstrative and protective; their loyalty, structured and reliable.

Studies from the University of Texas (Gosling et al., 2010) found that self-identified “dog people” scored higher in conscientiousness and extroversion, favoring group cohesion and outward communication.

This does not imply superficiality; rather, it reflects a form of warmth that seeks expression through shared activity and trust in established order.

The Cat Type: Independent, Reflective, and Loyal Through Choice

By contrast, those who prefer cats tend to prize autonomy, sensitivity, and introspection.

They form deep emotional connections but resist dependence, valuing space as much as closeness.

They may appear reserved, but their bonds are selective and enduring once established.

In the same Texas study, “cat people” scored higher in openness and neuroticism, traits associated with imagination, sensitivity, and emotional awareness. These individuals thrive in quiet environments where thought and observation precede action.

Their loyalty resembles that of the cat itself — chosen, contemplative, and unwavering once trust is earned.

Complementary Human Archetypes

The dog type mirrors the social world: order, cooperation, and overt affection.

The cat type mirrors the inner world: thought, creativity, and emotional independence.

Neither is superior; both express valid dimensions of human love and community.

In a balanced society, the two temperaments complete one another — the dog type sustaining connection through loyalty, the cat type deepening it through reflection.

Understanding which type we are may reveal not only how we love animals but how we love each other.

13.1 Who Embraces Which — Dogs, Cats, or Both

Human preference for a companion species often mirrors deeper aspects of temperament, upbringing, and worldview. The choice between a dog and a cat is rarely arbitrary; it reflects how an individual relates to order, emotion, and freedom.

The Dog Embracers — Structure and Society

People who gravitate toward dogs tend to value clear social roles, teamwork, and external affirmation.
They are energized by interaction and routine; they find reassurance in the dog’s visible loyalty and predictable behavior.
Empirical studies confirm this association: self-identified dog people score higher in extraversion and conscientiousness, showing a preference for rule-based structure and social engagement (Gosling et al., 2010; McNicholas & Collis, 2006).
Professions emphasizing coordination, public service, or group leadership often attract dog owners, whose companions reinforce shared rhythm and trust.

The Cat Embracers — Freedom and Reflection

Those who choose cats as primary companions usually cherish autonomy, introspection, and imaginative space.
They prefer emotional subtlety to overt dependence, thriving on quiet empathy rather than constant affirmation.
Research indicates that cat people generally score higher in openness to experience and sensitivity, correlating with creative and reflective temperaments (Herzog, 2011; Perrine & Osborne, 1998).
Artists, scholars, and independent thinkers often find the cat’s company conducive to contemplation — companionship that nurtures thought without interruption.

The Balanced Home — Having Both

Yet the most complete household may be one that welcomes both dog and cat.
Psychological and veterinary evidence suggests that multi-species homes can achieve a richer emotional ecology, where differing temperaments complement rather than conflict (Serpell, 2017).
The dog offers energy, structure, and social play; the cat contributes calm, grace, and introspective presence.
Together they form a microcosm of human harmony — a lesson in coexistence through difference.

To live with both is to acknowledge the full continuum of companionship:
the dog teaches love through loyalty; the cat teaches love through liberty.

14 Conclusion — The Quiet Triumph of the Cat

The cat, in its stillness, teaches humanity something profound about the art of love, dignity, and coexistence.
It neither commands nor obeys. It joins our lives without submission and departs without resentment. Its affection is not performance but presence — a silent recognition that trust requires neither spectacle nor subordination.

Across centuries and civilizations, the cat has walked beside poets and scientists, kings and wanderers, the weary and the wise alike — not because it serves, but because it understands balance.
Its composure reflects a truth that modern life too often forgets: that affection and freedom are not opposites but complements; that companionship, when genuine, asks for nothing but respect.

The dog’s companionship shaped civilization through service; the cat’s companionship civilizes the human spirit through serenity.
One guards our homes; the other guards our hearts.
Where the dog represents loyalty through obedience, the cat represents loyalty through choice — a subtler, freer devotion that speaks of trust without dependence.

When both coexist — as many homes wisely allow — humanity glimpses its own wholeness: the dog’s joyful fidelity joined with the cat’s sovereign calm.
Together they form a living symbol of harmony between action and contemplation, society and solitude, energy and elegance.
To favor one is to learn half of friendship; to embrace both is to understand love entire.

In an age of relentless motion and noise, the cat restores the rhythm of thought and tenderness.
It redefines friendship as presence without possession, love without demand, and trust without control.
To call the cat human’s best friend is not to dethrone the dog, but to complete the proverb’s truth:

The best friend is not the one who follows, but the one who stays — quietly, freely, faithfully.

Through the cat’s calm eyes, humanity rediscovers itself:
affection unchained by fear, dignity unthreatened by closeness, and peace born not of silence alone but of mutual understanding.

The cat’s friendship is more than companionship — it is a philosophy of being, a living meditation on the harmony between freedom and love, presence and respect, soul and stillness.

Authored by: Ronen Kolton Yehuda (MKR: Messiah King RKY)
Check out my blogs:
Substack: ronenkoltonyehuda.substack.com
Blogger: ronenkoltonyehuda.blogspot.com
Medium: medium.com/@ronenkoltonyehuda

References

• Allen, K., Blascovich, J., & Mendes, W. B. (2002). Cardiovascular Reactivity and the Presence of Pets, Friends, and Spouses: The Truth About Cats and Dogs. Psychosomatic Medicine, 64(5), 727–739.

• Bouma, E. M. C., et al. (2022). Family Member, Best Friend, Child … Human–Cat Relationships and Their Influence on Well-Being. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(1), 193.

• Bowlby, J. (1988). A Secure Base: Parent–Child Attachment and Healthy Human Development. Basic Books.

• Cornelissen, J. M. R., & Hopster, H. (2010). Dog Bites in the Netherlands: Incidence, Victims, Circumstances, and Public Health Implications. The Veterinary Journal, 186(3), 292–298.

• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “What” and “Why” of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.

• de Porter, T., & Overall, K. L. (2018). Feline Aggression Toward People: Diagnosis and Treatment. Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery, 20(7), 593–602.

• Fromm, E. (1956). The Art of Loving. Harper & Row.

• Gosling, S. D., Sandy, C. J., & Potter, J. (2010). Personality Differences in Dog People and Cat People. Anthrozoös, 23(3), 213–222.

• Hart, B. L., & Hart, L. A. (2013). Your Ideal Cat: Insights into Breed and Gender Differences in Cat Behavior. Purdue University Press.

• Herzog, H. A. (2011). The Impact of Pets on Human Health and Psychological Well-Being: Fact, Fiction, or Hypothesis? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(4), 236–239.

• Landsberg, G. M., Hunthausen, W., & Ackerman, L. J. (2013). Behavior Problems of the Dog and Cat (3rd ed.). Elsevier.

• McHarg, M., et al. (2018). Companion Animals and Human Happiness: The Psychological Impact of Cat Ownership. University of New South Wales Press.

• McNicholas, J., & Collis, G. M. (2006). Animals as Social Supports: Insights for Understanding Animal-Assisted Therapy. In A. H. Fine (Ed.), Handbook on Animal-Assisted Therapy (2nd ed., pp. 49–71). Academic Press.

• Moriello, K. A. (2017). Zoonotic Skin Diseases of Cats. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice, 47(2), 361–382.

• National Geographic. (2019). Why Your Cat’s Purr May Be Healing You. National Geographic Magazine.

• Noonan, C. J., Tong, H. J., & Hu, D. L. (2018). Cats Use Hollow Papillae to Wick Saliva into Their Fur. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), 115(35), 8912–8917.

• Patronek, G. J., Slater, M., & Marder, A. (2010). Use of a Number-Needed-to-Ban Calculation to Illustrate Limitations of Breed-Specific Legislation in Dog Bite Prevention. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 237(7), 788–792.

• Perrine, R. M., & Osborne, H. L. (1998). Personality Characteristics of Dog and Cat Persons. Anthrozoös, 11(1), 33–40.

• Reed, J. B., et al. (2014). Bartonella henselae Neuroretinitis: Ocular Manifestations and Long-Term Outcomes. Ophthalmology, 121(3), 1034–1042.

• Serpell, J. A. (2017). The Domestic Dog: Its Evolution, Behavior and Interactions with People (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

• Shreve, K. R. V., & Udell, M. A. R. (2017). Feline Social Cognition and Human Interaction. Behavioural Processes, 141, 61–66.

• Spach, D. H., et al. (1995). Ocular Manifestations of Cat-Scratch Disease. New England Journal of Medicine, 333(8), 473–476.

• Stella, J. L., & Croney, C. C. (2016). Coping Styles in the Domestic Cat: Behavior, Stress, and Welfare Implications. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 180, 80–87.

• Talan, D. A., et al. (1999). Bacteriologic Analysis of Infected Dog and Cat Bites. New England Journal of Medicine, 340(2), 85–92.

• Turner, D. C., & Bateson, P. (Eds.). (2014). The Domestic Cat: The Biology of Its Behaviour (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

• Vitale, K. R., Behnke, A. C., & Udell, M. A. R. (2019). Attachment Bonds Between Domestic Cats and Humans. Current Biology, 29(18), R864–R865.

Cornelissen, J. M. R., & Hopster, H. (2010) Dog Bites in the Netherlands: Incidence, Victims, Circumstances, and Public Health Implications The Veterinary Journal 186(3), 292–298

Fitzgerald, B. M., & Turner, D. C. (2000) Hunting Behaviour of Domestic Cats and Their Impact on Prey Populations In D. C. Turner & P. Bateson (Eds.), The Domestic Cat: The Biology of Its Behaviour (2nd ed., pp. 151–175) Cambridge University Press

Loss, S. R., Will, T., & Marra, P. P. (2013) The Impact of Free-Ranging Domestic Cats on Wildlife of the United States Nature Communications 4(1), 1396

Patronek, G. J., Slater, M., & Marder, A. (2010) Use of a Number-Needed-to-Ban Calculation to Illustrate Limitations of Breed-Specific Legislation in Dog Bite Prevention Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 237(7), 788–792

Turner, D. C., & Bateson, P. (Eds.) (2014) The Domestic Cat: The Biology of Its Behaviour (3rd ed.) Cambridge University Press

MKR: Messiah King RKY (Ronen Kolton Yehuda)

Check out my blogs at Substack, Blogger & Medium

Substack

ronenkoltonyehuda.substack.com

Blogger

ronenkoltonyehuda.blogspot.com/?m=1

Medium

https://medium.com/@ronenkoltonyehuda

Yours,

Ronen

Authored by: Ronen Kolton Yehuda (MKR: Messiah King RKY)
Check out my blogs:
Substack: ronenkoltonyehuda.substack.com
Blogger: ronenkoltonyehuda.blogspot.com
Medium: medium.com/@ronenkoltonyehuda